Skip to main content

Featured blogs

Why You Should Spend More Time Thinking About Physician Writing

  In brief   Being a physician has always been a demanding occupation. This is especially true for primary care physicians, who strive to provide and coordinate complete treatment for their patients. Such a goal necessitates availability, a broad range of medical expertise, effective utilization of the local healthcare system, and attention to the "big picture" and the details of a patient's life and health.   Introduction   When physicians learn to write creatively, they perceive significant and even career-saving benefits. Their comments on their experiences and what is significant in their lives and jobs help them become better physicians.   Why physicians make good creative writers   If we consider our life experiences to be a well from which to draw while becoming writers, physicians have an unusually deep well. They're engrossed in stories. They see bravery, cures, and spectacular failures. They see incredible situations, hear tragic words, make life-...
Post a Comment
Read more
Labels

What are the PICO elements in systematic review? – Pubrica


Full information: https://bit.ly/2TskCne
A systematic review is a method supporting evidence-based practices and healthcare decisions primarily through quantitative approach whereby a complete search is conducted in attempting to identify all the related publications which are integrated and assimilated through statistical analysis. The crucial factor for a systematic review is a comprehensive search process as it can be viewed as preventing the risk of bias and thus providing quality representation of available research. However, current research investigation process mainly focuses on different methods to ensure the comprehensive and bias-free searches for quantitative systematic reviews. Because of time consumption and resources requirementin completing a systematic literature search, multiple efforts have been made to study the sensitivity of searches, and thus it reduces the amount of time spent reviewing irrelevant articles which are of no use. Through devising a search strategy, a search tool has been used in organizing framework to list terms in the search questions by the main concepts and such frameworks will also be very helpful for teams doing a systematic review without an experienced information specialist.The PICO framework focuses on the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes and it is a commonly used tool quantitative systematic review to identify different components of clinical evidence for a systematic review, and the Cochrane Collaboration recognizes it.

P – Patient | Population
Most important characteristics of patients. Examples: Gender, age, and disease or condition
I – Intervention or exposure
Main intervention. Examples: Drug treatment, diagnostic and screening test
C – Comparison or control
Main alternative. Examples: Standard therapy, placebo, no treatment, and a gold standard
O – Outcome
The PICO model was developed to help structure a well-built clinical question and enable a literature searchof relevant citations. Since its introduction, it has played an essential role as a conceptualizing model for evidence-based medicine. The PICO framework will also help in reducing the time and retrieving related documents, thus ensures bias-free quality systematic review, and it also helps to determine the transparency of evidence synthesis results and findings.

Reference:  https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/

Why pubrica?
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.

Contact us :                        
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment